Can also be a folder and the action will recursively pull all the files. Also the branch heads at the remote are copied directly to. A list of files with the path separated by a space, relative to root of your repository. The cheat sheet explains the workflow file format, the workflow events, the workflow steps, and the checkout action in YAML. I'm sure that this added functionality would be very appreciated. This obviously implies the -no-checkout because there is nowhere to check out the working tree. Learn how to use GitHub Actions to automate your software development workflows with workflow templates, customization, and actions. If I use the branch name in the cache key then we potentially miss updates to the protobuf conformance test until the. Seems the author of the #579 PR also discussed supporting my use-case here: #579 (comment) The CI workflow is happening inside a docker image provided by the Swift project which has an old version of git so the checkout action is using the http api instead of git, so we can’t run git rev-parse (I tried this first). The change to the git fetch command run by this action would be to append '+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*' ( tagsRefSpec) to the end even though fetch-depth is > 0.Ī possible workaround would be to run another git fetch after using this checkout action like in #579 (comment), but that feels hacky. So I think it's misleading and should be changed to fetch all tags if fetch-tags is set to true. Nevertheless, using fetch-tags: true without overriding the default fetch-depth: 1 actually doesn't fetch any tags unless the workflow was triggered by a tag push. I think this new option should have defaulted to true or introduced in v4 instead where it could possibly have had the default false. It sets -no-tags in the git fetch command run by this action. And if youre a pro, youll love the ability to perform Git actions directly within the editor, saving you time and effort compared to using the Git command. Triggered the workflow.After #579 was merged and released with v3.6.0, the fetch-tags option was introduced and it's kind of a breaking change for projects that depend on reading tags from the git history. So by default, actions/checkout always checks out the commit that So now we know! Across the lifetime of a workflow run, github.sha neverĬhanges. Github.sha variable of the github context is fetched and checked out. Shows that actions/checkout ensures that exactly the commit specified in the For workflows triggered by push, this is the branch that was pushed. By default, the repository that triggered the. The fully-formed ref of the branch that triggered the workflow run. This action checks-out your repository under GITHUBWORKSPACE, so your workflow can access it. The commit SHA that triggered the workflow. Github.ref and github.sha values from the So if the ref parameter is left unspecified, the action will use the Triggered a workflow, this defaults to the reference or SHA for that event. Pushing tags, please consult the documentation and make appropriate adjustments. For events with other origins, such as pull requests or In the following, I will only discuss workflows triggered by pushĮvents to branches. To understand what’s going on, I did a little digging in the actions/checkoutĬode base. Popular GitHub issue from the actions/checkout action repository It’s not the first time that I have fallen into this trap, and since you are In the publish job that follows, I check out the code again to inspect theĬontents of our changelog file, only to find out that the changes are missing. Message containing the current date to the CHANGELOG.md file, and then usesĪction to commit and push the code to the repository. The update-changelog job checks out the code using the To ensure publishing only happensĪfter updating the changelog, we set publish.needs to update-changelog. name: Check Out the Repo Again uses: - name: Display CHANGELOG.md run: | cat CHANGELOG.mdĪs you can see, there are two jobs: update-changelog and publish. Needs: update-changelog runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: The second step runs the command that initiates and updates the. The first step uses the checkout action to obtain the repository contents. The following example defines a job named submodule-checkout that features two steps. name: Check Out the Repo uses: - name: Update CHANGELOG.md run: echo "Added changes on $(date)" > CHANGELOG.md - name: Commit and Push uses: publish: Automate submodule checkout by integrating the git submodule update CLI command into your GitHub Actions workflow.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |